<p/><br></br><p><b> Book Synopsis </b></p></br></br><i>Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science</i> contains sixteen original essays by leading authors in the philosophy of science, each one defending the affirmative or negative answer to one of eight specific questions, including: Are there laws of social science? Are causes physically connected to their effects? Is the mind a system of modules shaped by natural selection? <br /> <ul> <br /> </li> <li>Brings together fresh debates on eight of the most controversial issues in the philosophy of science.<br /> </li> <li>Questions addressed include: "Are there laws of social science?"; "Are causes physically connected to their effects?"; "Is the mind a system of modules shaped by natural selection?"<br /> </li> <li>Each question is treated by a pair of opposing essays written by eminent scholars, and especially commissioned for the volume.<br /> </li> <li>Lively debate format sharply defines the issues, and paves the way for further discussion.<br /> </li> <li>Will serve as an accessible introduction to the major topics in contemporary philosophy of science, whilst also capturing the imagination of professional philosophers.</li> </ul><p/><br></br><p><b> From the Back Cover </b></p></br></br><i>Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science</i> features original essays on some of the most hotly debated issues in the field. Are there laws of social science? Are causes physically connected to their effects? Is the mind a system of modules shaped by natural selection?<br /> <p>Eight central questions shape the volume, with each question treated by a pair of opposing essays. This distinctive format offers readers a unique opportunity to observe philosophers engaging in head-to-head debate. Together, the essays provide an accessible introduction to the major topics in contemporary philosophy of science, including empiricism, confirmation, realism, laws, causation, and explanation. Showcasing original arguments for well-defined positions, as well as clear and concise statements of sophisticated philosophical views, this volume is an excellent resource for professional philosophers and students alike.</p><p/><br></br><p><b> Review Quotes </b></p></br></br><br>This book offers an excellent way into both general philosophy of science and the important foundational issues that are generated by particular special sciences. The contributions are of the highest quality, and range from the epistemology of thought-experiments to the relationship between genes and whole organisms. The pairing of essays defending opposing points of view shows readers that philosophy of science is full of live issues that demand scientifically well-informed and philosophically sophisticated debate. <i>James Ladyman, University of Bristol</i> <br /> <p><br /> </p> <p>The essays in this invaluable collection are splendid and spirited, and they manage to encompass a broad range of the most exciting debates in philosophy of science today. By juxtaposing rival viewpoints on the same questions, this collection is sure to provoke vigorous responses from students and their teachers alike. <i>Marc Lange, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill</i><br /> </p> <p>The volume gives a real taste of current philosophical debate. The debated issues are real and well-defined, and not obscure conflicts of various -isms whose philosophical relevance is only understood by the participants. <i>Petri Ylikoski, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies</i></p><br><p/><br></br><p><b> About the Author </b></p></br></br><b>Christopher Hitchcock</b> is Professor of Philosophy at the California Institute of Technology. His articles have appeared in journals such as <i>The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy, Noûs, Philosophy of Science, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science</i>, and <i>Synthese.</i>
Price Archive shows prices from various stores, lets you see history and find the cheapest. There is no actual sale on the website. For all support, inquiry and suggestion messagescommunication@pricearchive.us