<p/><br></br><p><b> About the Book </b></p></br></br>"A short, provocative book that challenges basic assumptions about Victorian fiction. Now praised for its realism and formal coherence, the Victorian novel was not always great, or even good, in the eyes of its critics. As Elaine Freedgood reveals in Worlds Enough, it was only in the late 1970s that literary critics constructed a prestigious version of British realism, erasing more than a century of controversy about the value of Victorian fiction. Examining criticism of Victorian novels since the 1850s, Freedgood demonstrates that while they were praised for their ability to bring certain social truths to fictional life, these novels were also criticized for their formal failures and compared unfavorably to their French and German counterparts. She analyzes the characteristics of realism--denotation, omniscience, paratext, reference, and ontology--and the politics inherent in them, arguing that if critics displaced the nineteenth-century realist novel as the standard by which others are judged, literary history might be richer. It would allow peripheral literatures and the neglected wisdom of their critics to come fully into view. She concludes by questioning the aesthetic racism built into prevailing ideas about the centrality of realism in the novel, and how those ideas have affected debates about world literature. By re-examining the critical reception of the Victorian novel, Worlds Enough suggests how we can rethink our practices and perceptions about books we think we know."--<p/><br></br><p><b> Book Synopsis </b></p></br></br><p><b>A short, provocative book that challenges basic assumptions about Victorian fiction</b> <p/>Now praised for its realism and formal coherence, the Victorian novel was not always great, or even good, in the eyes of its critics. As Elaine Freedgood reveals in <i>Worlds Enough</i>, it was only in the late 1970s that literary critics constructed a prestigious version of British realism, erasing more than a century of controversy about the value of Victorian fiction. <p/>Examining criticism of Victorian novels since the 1850s, Freedgood demonstrates that while they were praised for their ability to bring certain social truths to fictional life, these novels were also criticized for their formal failures and compared unfavorably to their French and German counterparts. She analyzes the characteristics of realism--denotation, omniscience, paratext, reference, and ontology--and the politics inherent in them, arguing that if critics displaced the nineteenth-century realist novel as the standard by which others are judged, literary history might be richer. It would allow peripheral literatures and the neglected wisdom of their critics to come fully into view. She concludes by questioning the aesthetic racism built into prevailing ideas about the centrality of realism in the novel, and how those ideas have affected debates about world literature. <p/>By re-examining the critical reception of the Victorian novel, <i>Worlds Enough</i> suggests how we can rethink our practices and perceptions about books we think we know.</p><p/><br></br><p><b> Review Quotes </b></p></br></br><br>What this book is especially good on is the experience of <i>process</i> in the reading of the [Victorian] novel.<b>---Philip Davis, <i>Review of English Studies</i></b><br><br><p>Written with her trademark combination of sharp-wittedness and bluntness, Elaine Freedgood's short but ambitious book, <i>Worlds Enough: The Invention of Realism in the Victorian Novel</i>, aims to show that the prevailing understanding<br>of the Victorian novel's realism is fundamentally wrong and, more important, pernicious in its effects. . . . Elaine Freedgood is an iconoclastic, inventive critic whose work is suffused with moral and political urgency.</p><b>---Daniel Hack, <i>Modern Philology</i></b><br><br>[A] provocative and important new book on Victorian fiction.<b>---John O. Jordan, <i>Dickens Quarterly</i></b><br><br>Spiced with citations of critics past and present, this cogent, necessary book is ideal for students in Victorian surveys because it both covers the field and stretches it out to the global and the decolonizing.<b>---N. Birns, <i>Choice Reviews</i></b><br><p/><br></br><p><b> About the Author </b></p></br></br><b>Elaine Freedgood</b> is professor of English at New York University. Her previous books include <i>The Idea in Things: Fugitive Meaning in the Victorian Novel</i> and <i>Victorian Writing about Risk: Imagining a Safe England in a Dangerous World</i>.
Price Archive shows prices from various stores, lets you see history and find the cheapest. There is no actual sale on the website. For all support, inquiry and suggestion messagescommunication@pricearchive.us